![\"\"](\"http:\/\/wagingnonviolence.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/120403_happyworld.photoblog600-300x207.jpg\" "\\"120403_happyworld.photoblog600\\"")
Bhutan’s Prime Minister Jigme Thinley (left) and Costa Rican president Laura Chinchilla at the UN, via AFP.<\/p>\n<\/div>\nThe monks of South Asia have been chanting on behalf of the happiness and well-being of all creatures for 2,500 years. Now, the spirit of those mantras has marched out of the monastery and into the streets, even into the halls of the United Nations.<\/p>\n
Calling for nothing less than nonviolent resistance against the failed global economic system, the tiny Himalayan nation of Bhutan, sandwiched between India and China, took to the world stage last month<\/a> by leading a \u201cHigh Level Meeting on Happiness and Well-Being<\/a>.\u201d Its recommendation: Replace the Bretton Woods economic paradigm, imposed on the world by the United States in the wake of World War II, with an entirely new and inherently more just system.<\/p>\n The prime minister of Bhutan, Jigme Thinley, called on the people of the world to demand a change. Scholars, Nobel laureates, political actors, U.N. officials and staff, and spiritual and civil society leaders, many from the Global South, affirmed that the current system serves neither the human community nor other creatures on the planet.<\/p>\n \u201cThe GDP-led development model,\u201d Thinley told the gathering, \u201ccompels boundless growth on a planet with limited resources.\u201d Moreover, \u201cit no longer makes economic sense. It is the cause of our irresponsible, immoral and self-destructive actions.\u201d Finally, the prime minister concluded, \u201cThe purpose of development must be to create enabling conditions through public policy for the pursuit of the ultimate goal of happiness by all citizens.\u201d<\/p>\n Most of the 600 in attendance shared Bhutan\u2019s vision. Indian activist Vandana Shiva emphasized the importance of such a basic human need as food, the source of profit for a few and misery for many. As she has noted before<\/a>, \u201cThe poor are not those who have been \u2018left behind\u2019; they are the ones who have been robbed.\u201d The current paradigm creates a flow of financial, social, human and natural capital to the United States and other rich nations at the expense of everyone else.<\/p>\n Although Bhutan has faced criticism in the past for its treatment of Nepalese immigrants<\/a> and the\u00a0jailing of smokers<\/a>, it has made considerable progress in recent years by establishing a new democracy and implementing creative efforts to measure its citizens\u2019 well-being and happiness. The concept of Gross National Happiness was coined by the former King Jigme Singye Wangchuck, who abdicated in 2006 and set the democratization process in motion. To its credit, Bhutan is setting high standards for itself that may be difficult to reach, but the country is not alone in this endeavor.<\/p>\n Costa Rica\u2019s President Laura Chinchilla gave the keynote address<\/a>, sharing the experience of her country, noting, \u201cIn 1948 we decided to consolidate the best of our civic values, and abolished the army. We chose to solve our disputes through the ballots, not the bullets; we decided to invest in schools and teachers, not garrisons and soldiers.\u201d Rather than decreasing the national security, \u201cThis uninterrupted path turned Costa Rica into the most stable and longest living democracy in Latin America.\u201d<\/p>\n Interfaith spiritual leaders at the meeting, including the moderator of the Church of Canada and the Buddhist supreme patriarch of Thailand, as well as representatives from major religious traditions, issued their own statement calling for a new economic paradigm \u201cbased upon compassion, altruism, balance, and peace, dedicated to the well-being, happiness, dignity and sacredness of all forms of life.\u201d<\/p>\n Meanwhile, economists John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs distributed copies of the World Happiness Report<\/em><\/a>. They argue, \u201cWe live in an age of stark contradictions. The world enjoys technologies of unimaginable sophistication; yet has at least one billion people without enough to eat each day.\u201d<\/p>\n The official statement that came out of the meeting calls for a new paradigm with four pillars: ecological sustainability, happiness and well-being for all, fair distribution, and efficient use of resources. An unexpected 200 participants remained at the U.N. for two additional days to clarify what the new paradigm would look like, to propose new solutions<\/a>,\u00a0and to strategize how to mobilize a global movement in civil society to resist the current one and implement the change. Relevant civil society, educational, spiritual and activist organizations worldwide are being informed about the process, with an eye toward a 2014 convention that would replace Bretton Woods.<\/p>\n Widespread civil resistance movements would be a vital component in bringing about a shift toward so radically different a paradigm as this. Yet the meeting suggests that insufficient use has been made of the United Nations as a venue by change activists. Despite the U.N.\u2019s obvious shortcomings \u2014 for instance, OWS recently protested the influence of corporations on environmental proceedings<\/a> \u2014 it is nonetheless an infrastructure where every nation has a voice, at least in theory. Paradoxically, Global South elites who are also victims of the current economic paradigm provide an entr\u00e9e into the system for grassroots activists, and this meeting demonstrates that the U.N. can offer a venue for radical critique. But the U.N. will only work on behalf of the people if the people insist that it does and begin to explore the possibilities that it might offer as a space for challenging injustice at a global level.<\/p>\n Dutch Rabbi Awraham Soetendorp, a long-time veteran of international meetings, observed that this one had \u201ca different spirit\u201d and that the time was ripe for unprecedented change. His call for a 0.01 percent donation of everyone\u2019s income, especially from the rich nations, was received with enthusiasm by the civil society working group, which is creating a World Happiness Bank (a tentative name) that would promote and model the new economic paradigm.<\/p>\n This change will not happen, of course, without the mobilization of a nonviolent resistance movement<\/a>. That\u2019s where we come in; we have a new opportunity to act against a system that is robbing humanity and its fellow creatures through what the meeting\u2019s statement calls the \u201cprivate capture of the common wealth.\u201d And we can do so by following the lead of the marginalized.<\/p>\n